[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1226294895.5478.5.camel@brick>
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 21:28:15 -0800
From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: x86_32 has its own irq_regs definition
Impact: prevent second percpu define of unused irq_regs
Arches that have their own irq_regs definition are expected to
define ARCH_HAS_OWN_IRQ_REGS or else a generic (unused) set
will also be defined in lib/irq_regs.c
Sparse noticed the unused generic one had no prototype:
lib/irq_regs.c:15:1: warning: symbol 'per_cpu____irq_regs' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/irq_regs_32.h | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_regs_32.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_regs_32.h
index af2f02d..86afd74 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_regs_32.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_regs_32.h
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
#include <asm/percpu.h>
+#define ARCH_HAS_OWN_IRQ_REGS
+
DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct pt_regs *, irq_regs);
static inline struct pt_regs *get_irq_regs(void)
--
1.6.0.3.866.gc189b
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists