[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081110075827.GE2093@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:58:27 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Grant Grundler <grundler@...isc-linux.org>
Cc: Nobin Mathew <nobin.mathew@...il.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: sharing interrupt between PCI device
* Grant Grundler <grundler@...isc-linux.org> wrote:
> [+ingo - question for you about disable_irq() below]
> The same problem exists with disable_irq() : only takes a global
> IRQ# and no additional identifying information to prevent disabling
> a shared IRQ. So I'm not sure if this is a bug with ACPI or design
> flaw in generic IRQ APIs. Ingo?
that's how disable_irq() always worked: it disables all handlers on
that IRQ#. If the IRQ# is shared, it disables all handlers.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists