lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:41:12 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Rufus & Azrael <rufus-azrael@...ericable.fr> Cc: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>, Linux-kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Fixing improper annotation. * Rufus & Azrael <rufus-azrael@...ericable.fr> wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: >> * Rufus& Azrael<rufus-azrael@...ericable.fr> wrote: >> >> >>> Hi Rakib, >>> >>> >>> Your two patches set for x86 init_thread_xsate function section >>> mismatch is correct to fix the compilation warning, but generates >>> this other one : >>> >>> >>>> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.cpuinit.text+0x7de): Section mismatch in reference >>>> from the function xsave_cntxt_init() to the function >>>> .init.text:__alloc_bootmem() >>>> The function __cpuinit xsave_cntxt_init() references >>>> a function __init __alloc_bootmem(). >>>> If __alloc_bootmem is only used by xsave_cntxt_init then >>>> annotate __alloc_bootmem with a matching annotation. >>>> >> >> that's with both 1/2 and 2/2 applied? >> >> Ingo >> >> > Yes Ingo with the two patches applied. okay - so i wont apply them until the full scope of the problems here is mapped. We might be best off by marking xsave_cntxt_init() non-init altogether for the time being? Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists