[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:18:54 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@...ibm.com>,
Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
dm-devel <dm-devel@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
axboe@...nel.dk
Subject: Re: Queue upcall locking (was: [dm-devel] [RFC][PATCH] fix
dm_any_congested() to properly sync up with suspend code path)
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 09:19:21AM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> For device mapper, congested_fn asks every device in the tree and make OR
> of their bits --- so if the user has 50 devices, it asks them all.
>
> For md-linear, md-raid0, md-raid1, md-raid10 and md-multipath it does the
> same --- asking every device.
>
> If you have a better idea how to implement congested_fn, say it.
Well, even asking 50 devices shouldn't take that long normally. Do you
take some sleeping lock that might block forever? In that case I would
just return congested for that device as it would delay pdflush
otherwise.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists