linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET] FUSE: extend FUSE to support more operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:14:16 -0500
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
	fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, greg@...ah.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] FUSE: extend FUSE to support more operations

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:41:18PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > emulated char devices to be char devices?  What I mean is, what would
> > happen if instead of a char device /dev/dsp would be a regular file
> > mounted on /dev/dsp (which implements all the necessary interfaces:
> > ioctls, poll, etc)?
> 
> For most it would work, I suppose, but there are all sorts of wonky
> users out in the wild (and quite a few that we don't have source access
> to) and different configurations, so I think it's better to appear as
> proper character device if it is a character device.  It will also help
> udev and other desktop thingies deal with devices implemented in userland.

Note that mounting a char device on /dev/dsp is exactly the same as
mounting a regular file on /dev/dsp - the only difference is what you
set i_mode to.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/