[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <491AAA84.5040801@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:05:56 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Izik Eidus <ieidus@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, chrisw@...hat.com, izike@...ranet.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Add replace_page(), change the mapping of pte from
one page into another
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> Can I make a question ? (I'm working for memory cgroup.)
>
> Now, we do charge to anonymous page when
> - charge(+1) when it's mapped firstly (mapcount 0->1)
> - uncharge(-1) it's fully unmapped (mapcount 1->0) vir page_remove_rmap().
>
> My quesion is
> - PageKSM pages are not necessary to be tracked by memory cgroup ?
> - Can we know that "the page is just replaced and we don't necessary to do
> charge/uncharge".
> - annonymous page from KSM is worth to be tracked by memory cgroup ?
> (IOW, it's on LRU and can be swapped-out ?)
>
My feeling is that shared pages should be accounted as if they were not
shared; that is, a share page should be accounted for each process that
shares it. Perhaps sharing within a cgroup should be counted as 1 page
for all the ptes pointing to it.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists