[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081112113514.GB6372@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:35:14 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan S <svaidyan@...ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][mmotm] Sched fix stale value in average load per task
* Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> cpu_avg_load_per_task() returns a stale value when nr_running is 0.
> It returns an older stale (caculated when nr_running was non zero)
> value. This patch returns and sets rq->avg_load_per_task to zero
> when nr_running is 0.
>
> Compile and boot tested on a x86_64 box.
>
> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> kernel/sched.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
applied to tip/sched/urgent, thanks Balbir!
i'm wondering, have you observed load-balancer misbehavior due to this
load-average imprecision bug, on some workload? (or have you found
this via code review)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists