[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081112114614.GA11352@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:46:14 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan S <svaidyan@...ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, efault@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH][mmotm] Sched fix stale value in average load per task
* Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> * Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> [2008-11-12 16:19:00]:
>
> > + else
> > + rq->avg_load_per_task = 0;
> >
> > return rq->avg_load_per_task;
>
> On second thoughts, does this look better? (Based on Mike
> Galbraith's suggestion)
yes - but could you send it as a delta patch against your previous
patch please? We want the simpler patch for tip/sched/urgent, as a
v2.6.28 fix - the removal of rq->avg_load_per_task can wait until
v2.6.29. (Please also include Mike's Ack in the patch if he acks the
patch.)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists