[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1226511327.23498.3.camel@localhost>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:35:27 +0100
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC] Add PR_PREFIX to pr_xyz macros.
Hi Linus,
there is one spin-off from the kernel message patches I would still
like to get upstream: replacing all the different printk macros in the
s390 device drivers with dev_xyz and pr_xyz.
One thing the s390 printk macros have been doing which I miss with the
pr_xyz macros is a way to automatically prefix the messages with the
driver name. This is quite handy, saves some typing and shortens the
printk line. The pr_xyz macros could be taught about a prefix, would
something like the patch below be acceptable?
The idea is to add a '#define PR_PREFIX "driver"' to the start of the
source file and have the pr_xyz macros paste the prefix to each message.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
---
Subject: [PATCH] Add PR_PREFIX to pr_xyz macros.
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
A common reason for device drivers to implement their own printk macros
is the lack of a printk prefix with the standard pr_xyz macros. The most
common use of the prefix would be to add the name of the device driver to
all printks in a source file.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
---
include/linux/kernel.h | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff -urpN linux-2.6/include/linux/kernel.h linux-2.6-patched/include/linux/kernel.h
--- linux-2.6/include/linux/kernel.h 2008-11-11 16:59:04.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6-patched/include/linux/kernel.h 2008-11-11 17:19:04.000000000 +0100
@@ -318,32 +318,38 @@ static inline char *pack_hex_byte(char *
return buf;
}
-#define pr_emerg(fmt, arg...) \
- printk(KERN_EMERG fmt, ##arg)
-#define pr_alert(fmt, arg...) \
- printk(KERN_ALERT fmt, ##arg)
-#define pr_crit(fmt, arg...) \
- printk(KERN_CRIT fmt, ##arg)
-#define pr_err(fmt, arg...) \
- printk(KERN_ERR fmt, ##arg)
-#define pr_warning(fmt, arg...) \
- printk(KERN_WARNING fmt, ##arg)
-#define pr_notice(fmt, arg...) \
- printk(KERN_NOTICE fmt, ##arg)
-#define pr_info(fmt, arg...) \
- printk(KERN_INFO fmt, ##arg)
+#ifndef PR_PREFIX
+#define pr_fmt(format) format
+#else
+#define pr_fmt(format) PR_PREFIX ": " format
+#endif
+
+#define pr_emerg(fmt, ...) \
+ printk(KERN_EMERG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define pr_alert(fmt, ...) \
+ printk(KERN_ALERT pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define pr_crit(fmt, ...) \
+ printk(KERN_CRIT pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define pr_err(fmt, ...) \
+ printk(KERN_ERR pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define pr_warning(fmt, ...) \
+ printk(KERN_WARNING pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define pr_notice(fmt, ...) \
+ printk(KERN_NOTICE pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define pr_info(fmt, ...) \
+ printk(KERN_INFO pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
/* If you are writing a driver, please use dev_dbg instead */
#if defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_PRINTK_DEBUG)
#define pr_debug(fmt, ...) do { \
- dynamic_pr_debug(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+ dynamic_pr_debug(pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__); \
} while (0)
#elif defined(DEBUG)
-#define pr_debug(fmt, arg...) \
- printk(KERN_DEBUG fmt, ##arg)
+#define pr_debug(fmt, ...) \
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
#else
-#define pr_debug(fmt, arg...) \
- ({ if (0) printk(KERN_DEBUG fmt, ##arg); 0; })
+#define pr_debug(fmt, ...) \
+ ({ if (0) printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__); 0; })
#endif
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists