[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811121408290.31606@quilx.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:11:32 -0600 (CST)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>,
Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allocate module.ref array dynamically
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Rusty Russell wrote:
> You've introduced a third set of per-cpu primitives, yet the second set still
> has 0 users.
What second set?
> Your new basic interface is:
> CPU_ALLOC/CPU_FREE/CPU_PTR/THIS_CPU/__THIS_CPU
>
> I don't think the CAPS adds anything. I'd like to see standard docbook
> comments. It's not clear from your documentation whether this allocates for
> all possible or only all online CPUs, and the difference between THIS_CPU and
> __THIS_CPU is not immediately obvious.
The allocation is for all allocated percpu areas which is now per possible
cpu. The difference between THIS_CPU and __THIS_CPU is the context check
by smp_processor_id()
> How about re-using alloc_percpu/free_percpu/per_cpu_ptr APIs? Rename THIS_CPU
> to __get_cpu_ptr and implement get_cpu_ptr and put_cpu_ptr wrappers (a-la
> get_cpu_var).
The caps functions are macros not functions. Macros are
capitalized. alloc_percpu must stay until the last remains have been
evicted. And the API does work differently.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists