[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811111827370.31625@quilx.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:28:57 -0600 (CST)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: penberg@...helsinki.fi, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, travis@....com, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
vegard.nossum@...il.com
Subject: Re: [patch 0/7] cpu alloc stage 2
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> It all looks very nice to me. It's a shame about the lack of any
> commonality with local_t though.
At the end of the full patchset local_t is no more because cpu ops can
completely replace all use cases for local_t.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists