linux-kernel - Re: Who broke cb8f488c33 patch? (was Re: [PATCH 1/1] USBHID: correct start/stop cycle)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:50:38 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc:	vda.linux@...glemail.com, hugh@...itas.com,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, deller@....de, jirislaby@...il.com,
	jer@...too.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Who broke cb8f488c33 patch? (was Re: [PATCH 1/1] USBHID:
 correct start/stop cycle)

On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 01:34:54 +0100 (CET)
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz> wrote:

> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> 
> > > > > I fully bisected it, and the final "buggy" patch seems to have been 
> > > > > Denys Vlasenko's patch: cb8f488c33539f096580e202f5438a809195008f (see 
> > > > > http://github.com/jonsmirl/digispeaker/commit/cb8f488c33539f096580e202f5438a809195008f) 
> > > > > Denys: Any reason you removed "!prev" in front of "expand_stack"?
> > > > Looks like I erroneously thought it can't be NULL,
> > > > or that expand_upwards() is ok with getting NULL vma parameter.
> > > > I looked again and neither is true.
> > > > Sorry, looks like I indeed broke this.
> > > Hmm, so ... ? Seems like this didn't get fixed in Linus' tree yet?
> > I found my original email in "sent" folder. The patch in that mail does 
> > NOT remove !prev. That change had beed added by someone else. See 
> > attached file with original email.
> > Ok, I think we are not much interested in who did it, 
> 
> Hmm, I in fact think we would like to know who removed the check and 
> folded it into your original patch. I have added all the Signoffs and CCs 
> to the recepient list.
> 
> Andrew usually puts
> 
> 	[someone@...ewhere.com: added this and that to the patch]
> 
> marker into the changelog, but it's not the case here. 
> 
> Having your name in Signed-off-by field of something you are not aware of 
> should make you feel at least a little bit nervous IMHO.
> 
> > let's fix it for good.
> > Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
> > --- linux-2.6.28-rc4/mm/mmap.c	Mon Nov 10 01:36:15 2008
> > +++ linux-2.6.28-rc4.fix/mm/mmap.c	Wed Nov 12 01:21:39 2008
> > @@ -1704,7 +1704,7 @@
> >  	vma = find_vma_prev(mm, addr, &prev);
> >  	if (vma && (vma->vm_start <= addr))
> >  		return vma;
> > -	if (expand_stack(prev, addr))
> > +	if (!prev || expand_stack(prev, addr))
> >  		return NULL;
> >  	if (prev->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) {
> >  		if (mlock_vma_pages_range(prev, addr, prev->vm_end) < 0)
> 

It looks like this was caused by me fixing rejects.  That was the fancy
include-lots-of-context-so-it-wont-apply patch.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/