[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081113084040.GD25479@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:40:40 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Pekka Paalanen <pq@....fi>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ftrace: do not update max buffer with no users
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> Impact: only use max latency buffer when a user is configured
>
> Pekka reported a bug with the resizing of the buffers when only the
> MMIO tracer was configured. The issue was, to save memory, the max
> latency trace buffer was only initialized if a tracer that uses it
> is configured in.
>
> What happened was that the max latency buffer was never initialized
> when only the MMIO tracer was configurued. The MMIO tracer does not
> use the max tracer, which kept it from being initialized. But the
> resize code still tried to resize the max latency buffers, but
> because they were never allocated, the resize code was passed a NULL
> pointer.
>
> This patch checks if the max tracer is NULL before resizing it. It
> also hides the modification functions of the max tracer behind the
> TRACER_MAX_TRACE config.
>
> Reported-by: Pekka Paalanen <pq@....fi>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace.c | 171 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
This is _way_ too much churn for .28, we need a much simpler solution.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists