[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081113125419.GA32574@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:54:19 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing/function-return-tracer: Make the function
return tracer lockless
* Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> Ok, so correct me if I'm wrong. Global timestamp would be captured
> by using sched_clock(). That's what is done currently in
> ring_buffer_time_stamp() And the global timestamp would be
> combination of a last global timestamp and a relative position from
> now to this last at each insertion in the ring-buffer (or tracing
> time capture). Am I right? I don't really understand why you want to
> update with a cmpxchg loop...
the cmpxchg loop would be needed to ensure timestamp monotonicity:
every new "global time" is cmpxchg-ed with the "previous global time"
(and is first monotonicity checked).
"prev_global_time" also acts as a global serializer: it ensures that
events are timestamped in a monotonic and ordered way.
i.e. something like this (pseudocode, without the cmpxchg):
u64 prev_global_time;
DEFINE_PER_CPU(prev_local_time);
u64 global_time()
{
u64 now, delta, now_global;
prev_global = prev_global_time;
now = sched_clock();
delta = now - per_cpu(prev_local_time, this_cpu);
per_cpu(prev_local_time, this_cpu) = now;
now_global = prev_global + delta;
prev_global = now_global;
return now_global;
}
note how we build "global time" out of "local time".
The cmpxchg would be used to put the above one into a loop, and
instead of updating the global time in a racy way:
prev_global = now_global;
We'd update it via the cmpxchg:
atomic64_t prev_global_time;
...
while (atomic64_cmpxchg(&prev_global_time,
prev_global, now_global) != prev_global) {
[...]
}
To make sure the global time goes monotonic. (this way we also avoid a
spinlock - locks are fragile for instrumentation)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists