[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081113160633.GA13095@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:06:33 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc] x86: optimise page fault path a little
* Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de> wrote:
> > 32-bit should use oops_begin() too. Solves the previous comment as
> > well.
> >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> > > + die("Oops", regs, error_code);
> > > + bust_spinlocks(0);
> > > + do_exit(SIGKILL);
> > > +#else
> > > + if (__die("Oops", regs, error_code))
> > > + regs = NULL;
> > > + /* Executive summary in case the body of the oops scrolled away */
> > > + printk(KERN_EMERG "CR2: %016lx\n", address);
> > > + oops_end(flags, regs, SIGKILL);
> > > +#endif
> >
> > this difference seems unnecessary too - 32-bit should use oops_end()
> > too.
>
> Probably all 3 good comments, but I didn't want to be tempted into
> changing behaviour (modulo adding bugs). Easy to merge them up in a
> subsequent patch, however...
please do feel tempted to clean this code up - and if it changes
behavior, split it up into smaller steps. The patch is already quite
large with a flux of 430 lines:
1 file changed, 251 insertions(+), 188 deletions(-)
... your primary goal is faster code, we also want cleaner code. I
think we can meet in the middle, have faster _and_ cleaner code, and
it's a done deal ;)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists