lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:36:43 -0500
From:	Phillip Susi <psusi@....rr.com>
To:	device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, fernando@....ntt.co.jp,
	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, xemul@...nvz.org,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, agk@...rceware.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 1/8] dm-ioband: Introduction

Ryo Tsuruta wrote:
> Create two ioband devices "ioband1" and "ioband2". "ioband1" is mapped
> to "/dev/sda1" and has a weight of 40. "ioband2" is mapped to "/dev/sda2"
> and has a weight of 10. "ioband1" can use 80% --- 40/(40+10)*100 ---
> of the bandwidth of the physical disk "/dev/sda" while "ioband2" can use 20%.

Just to clarify, when you say ioband1 can use 80% of the bandwidh, you 
mean that is how much it will get if both io bands are loaded right?  If 
there is no activity on ioband2, then ioband1 will get the full disk 
bandwidth right?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ