[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200811132208.43694.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:08:42 +0100
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Missing CONFIG_IDE_LEGACY definition (Re: linux-next: Tree for November 13)
On Thursday 13 November 2008, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:33:16 +1100,
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20081112:
> >
> > Undropped tree:
> > security-testing
> >
> > Dropped trees (temporarily):
> > sh (build problems)
> > creds (non-trivial conflict)
> > userns (it depends on creds)
> > semaphore-removal (due to unfixed conflicts against Linus' tree)
> > firmware (unfixed build failure)
> >
> > The usb tree lost its conflict.
> >
> > The net tree lost its 3 conflicts.
>
> The IDE tree update seems broken for some old devices.
> CONFIG_IDE_LEGACY is selected by them but it's nowhere defined in
> Kconfig.
Thanks for noticing and fixing this.
I've integrated your fix into the guilty patch ("ide: move legacy
ISA/VLB ports handling to ide-legacy.c") to preserve bisectability.
Bart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists