linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Store the relevant miscdevice in file->private_data in misc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:18:18 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Store the relevant miscdevice in file->private_data in
	misc_open()

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:54:41AM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 09:31 -0800, Greg KH wrote: 
> > On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 03:49:50PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > Currently it's not easy to share file_operations between multiple
> > > instances of a miscdevice. In order to do this, the device code needs to
> > > store a list of all it's miscdevice instances, and when fops->open() is
> > > called, search the list and find the right device based on the minor
> > > number.
> > > 
> > > However the generic miscdevice code already has a list of miscdevices,
> > > and uses this to find the right device in misc_open(). If misc_open()
> > > would store the miscdevice it found in file->private_data, then the
> > > device code wouldn't need to worry about storing it's own separate list
> > > and searching that as well.
> > > 
> > > The rest of the miscdevice code does not use file->private_data, so the
> > > device code is still free to use file->private_data for something else
> > > if it wants to.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
> > 
> > Do you have a follow-on patch for some misc device using code that would
> > take advantage of this change?
> 
> Ah, good point. I do, but not for upstream :/

Hm, then I have to ask why should we take this change?

And why would the driver not be availble for upstream to take?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/