[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081114061847.GB2227@x200.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:18:47 +0300
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, tj@...nel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, albcamus@...il.com,
pjones@...hat.com, alex.shi@...el.com
Subject: Re: system fails to boot
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 01:16:21PM +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> Jens,
>
> We run into system boot failure with kernel 2.6.28-rc. We found it on a couple of
> machines, including T61 notebook, nehalem machine, and another HPC NX6325 notebook.
> All the machines use FedoraCore 8 or FedoraCore 9. With kernel prior to 2.6.28-rc,
> system boot doesn't fail.
>
> I debug it and locate the root cause. Pls. see
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11899
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471517
>
> As a matter of fact, there are 2 bugs.
>
> 1)root=/dev/sda1, system boot randomly fails. Mostly, boot for 5
> times and fails once. nash has a bug. Some of its functions misuse return value 0.
> Sometimes, 0 means timeout and no uevent available. Sometimes, 0 means nash gets
> an uevent, but the uevent isn't block-related (for exmaple, usb). If by coincidence,
> kernel tells nash that uevents are available, but kernel also set timeout, nash
> might stops collecting other uevents in queue if current uevent isn't block-related.
> I work out a patch for nash to fix it.
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18858
>
> 2) root=LABEL=/, system always can't boot. initrd init reports
> switchroot fails. Here is an executation branch of nash when booting:
> (1) nash read /sys/block/sda/dev; Assume major is 8 (on my desktop)
> (2) nash query /proc/devices with the major number; It found line "8 sd";
> (3) nash use 'sd' to search its own probe table to find device (DISK) type for the device
> and add it to its own list;
> (4) Later on, it probes all devices in its list to get filesystem labels;
> scsi register "8 sd" always.
> When major is 259, nash fails to find the device(DISK) type. I enables CONFIG_DEBUG_BLOCK_EXT_DEVT=y
> when compiling kernel, so 259 is picked up for device /dev/sda1, which causes nash to fail
> to find device (DISK) type.
> To fixing issue 2), I create a patch for nash and another patch for kernel.
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18859
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18837
>
> Below is the patch for kernel 2.6.28-rc4. It registers blkext, a new block device in proc/devices.
>
> With 2 patches on nash and 1 patch on kernel, I boot my machines for dozens of times
> without failure.
>
> Signed-off-by Zhang Yanmin <yanmin.zhang@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Would you like to accept the kernel patch into your testing tree? Pls. do CC to me when replying
> as I couldn't subscribe LKML emails now.
>
> ---
>
> --- linux-2.6.28-rc4/block/genhd.c 2008-11-11 08:37:24.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-2.6.28-rc4_label/block/genhd.c 2008-11-13 04:05:35.000000000 +0800
> @@ -1028,6 +1028,7 @@ static int __init proc_genhd_init(void)
> {
> proc_create("diskstats", 0, NULL, &proc_diskstats_operations);
> proc_create("partitions", 0, NULL, &proc_partitions_operations);
> + register_blkdev(BLOCK_EXT_MAJOR, "blkext");
> return 0;
> }
> module_init(proc_genhd_init);
It's procfs-specific init, what's up?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists