[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081113162128.28e508ca.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:21:28 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Cc: ananth@...ibm.com, jkenisto@...ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, systemtap@...rces.redhat.com,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] kprobes: Add kprobe_insn_mutex and cleanup
arch_remove_kprobe()
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:56:21 -0500
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com> wrote:
> Add kprobe_insn_mutex for protecting kprobe_insn_pages hlist, and remove
> kprobe_mutex from architecture dependent code.
>
> This allows us to call arch_remove_kprobe() (and free_insn_slot) while holding
> kprobe_mutex.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/kprobes.c | 2 --
> arch/ia64/kernel/kprobes.c | 8 +++++---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c | 7 ++++---
> arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c | 7 ++++---
> arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c | 7 ++++---
> include/linux/kprobes.h | 1 -
> kernel/kprobes.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
For some reasons sparc64 never had this mutex. You've checked that
sparc64 will be OK after this change?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists