[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <491D987F.1000301@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:25:51 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
oprofile-list@...ts.sf.net
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Jiri Benc <jbenc@...e.cz>, Vilem Marsik <vmarsik@...e.cz>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Oprofile : need to adjust PC by 16 bytes
Very strange results on my Intel E5450 CPU
I found that I have to bias regs->ip by 16 bytes in order to have
correct profiling.
Does it rings a bell to anyone ?
opcontrol --version
opcontrol: oprofile 0.9.4 compiled on Nov 3 2008 06:45:57
Thank you
diff --git a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
index 3f1b81a..051fb16 100644
--- a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
+++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
@@ -131,7 +131,9 @@ static int ppro_check_ctrs(struct pt_regs * const regs,
continue;
rdmsrl(msrs->counters[i].addr, val);
if (CTR_OVERFLOWED(val)) {
+ regs->ip -= 0x10;
oprofile_add_sample(regs, i);
+ regs->ip += 0x10;
wrmsrl(msrs->counters[i].addr, -reset_value[i]);
}
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists