[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1226676961.3353.78.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:36:01 -0500
From: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...dex.ru>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sct@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, adilger@....com, tytso@....edu,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, dedekind@...radead.org,
ext-adrian.hunter@...ia.com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
dushistov@...l.ru, jmorris@...ei.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] filesystems: use has_capability_noaudit interface for
reserved blocks checks
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 09:55 +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> Eric Paris wrote:
> > ext[2,3,4], ufs, and ubifs all check for CAP_SYS_RESOURCE to determine
> > if they should allow reserved blocks to be used. A process not having
> > this capability is not failing some security decision and should not be
> > audited. Thus move to using has_capability_noaudit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
> > ---
>
> UBIFS part looks OK, as long as the whole idea of the patch is right, which
> I have not checked, but assume it is.
>
> The only question is are you sure exporting 'cap_capable()' is relevant
> to this patch? You do not seem to call it directly.
After this change, modules call has_capability_noaudit() which is a
#define which turns this into modules calling
security_capable_noaudit(). You noticed this and decided it was correct
to make that export. But when CONFIG_SECURITY is not set
security_capable_notaudit() is a static inline which calls
cap_capable(). See include/linux/security.h line 2832 in the linux-next
tree. Now modules are calling cap_capable directly, thus the export.
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists