[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7c86c4470811141310h4fd3c5fbvc6357985cf2aed0e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:10:35 +0100
From: "stephane eranian" <eranian@...glemail.com>
To: "Metzger, Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@...el.com>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, "Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Markus Metzger" <markus.t.metzger@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: debugctl msr
Markus,
I am trying another approach for connecting perfmon to ds.c. I have
added new callbacks
to perfmon to allow me to invoke ds_request_pebs, once I know the
target thread or CPU.
That seems to work, however I ran into a spinlock problem is ds_request():
static int ds_request(struct task_struct *task, void *base, size_t size,
ds_ovfl_callback_t ovfl, enum ds_qualifier qual)
{
struct ds_context *context;
unsigned long buffer, adj;
const unsigned long alignment = (1 << 3);
int error = 0;
if (!ds_cfg.sizeof_ds)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
/* we require some space to do alignment adjustments below */
if (size < (alignment + ds_cfg.sizeof_rec[qual]))
return -EINVAL;
/* buffer overflow notification is not yet implemented */
if (ovfl)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
spin_lock(&ds_lock);
>> if (!check_tracer(task))
>> return -EPERM;
You need to spin_unlock() before returning here!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists