linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] edac: fix mpc85xx and add mpc8536 mpc8560

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:42:53 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	dougthompson@...ssion.com
Cc:	dougthompson@...ssion.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] edac: fix mpc85xx and add mpc8536 mpc8560

On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:18:03 -0700
dougthompson@...ssion.com wrote:

> From: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
> 
> All other compatibles that are uniquely identifying the processor use
> a prefix of the form fsl,mpc85...'.  We add support for it so we
> can deprecate the older 'fsl,85...' that was improperly used here.
> 
> Additionally added mpc8536 & mpc8560 to the compatible lists.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Thompson <dougthompson@...ssion.com>
> Acked-by: Dave Jiang <djiang@...sta.com>

I don't understand how this patch changes kernel behaviour (this is due
to my ignorance and your crappy changelog).  So I randomly queued it
for 2.6.29.  If that was wrong, please let me know.

> 
> This patch is based on Nate's 8572 patch.

Who's Nate?  He should at least get a cc.  Perhaps a signed-off-by: too?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/