[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <491CC31C.7090606@ru.mvista.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 03:15:24 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
To: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] New IDE/block driver for OCTEON SOC Compact Flash interface.
Hello, I wrote:
>> As part of our efforts to get the Cavium OCTEON processor support
>> merged (see: http://marc.info/?l=linux-mips&m=122600487218824), we
>> have this CF driver for your consideration.
>>
>> Most OCTEON variants have *no* DMA or interrupt support on the CF
>> interface so a simple bit-banging approach is taken. Although if DMA is
>> available, we do take advantage of it.
>>
>> The register definitions are part of the chip support patch set
>> mentioned above, and are not included here.
>>
>> At this point I would like to get feedback as to whether this is a
>> good approach for the CF driver, or perhaps generate ideas about other
>> possible approaches.
>
> It's totally unacceptable for drivers/ide/ as this is
> self-containeed driver no using IDE core for anything, so this can
> only fit well to drivers/block/.
I probably need to clarify that it will hardly be accepted into
drivers/block/ as well, being a mere CF driver.
MBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists