[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <491E27E8.7050401@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 02:37:44 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: [PATCH] tracing/function-return-tracer: Add a barrier to ensure return
stack index is incremented in memory
Impact: Fix possible race condition in ftrace function return tracer
This fixes a possible race condition if index incrementation
is not immediately flushed in memory.
Thanks for Andi Kleen and Steven Rostedt for pointing out this issue
and give me this solution.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
index fe83273..db25236 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ static int push_return_trace(unsigned long ret, unsigned long long time,
return -EBUSY;
index = ++ti->curr_ret_stack;
+ barrier();
ti->ret_stack[index].ret = ret;
ti->ret_stack[index].func = func;
ti->ret_stack[index].calltime = time;
--
1.5.2.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists