| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <874p2916hb.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:09:04 +0100 From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> To: "Karl Pickett" <karl.pickett@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: tcp_tw_recycle broken? "Karl Pickett" <karl.pickett@...il.com> writes: > > May I just confirm.. is tcp_tw_reuse NOT dependent on receiving timestamps? The big problem is that both are incompatible with NAT. So if you ever talk to any NATed clients don't use it. -Andi -- ak@...ux.intel.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists