lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49200B3C.7020203@gentoo.org>
Date:	Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:59:56 +0100
From:	Raúl Porcel <armin76@...too.org>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
CC:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
	klausman@...too.org, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, rth@...ddle.net
Subject: Re: [ALPHA] 2.6.28-rc fails to compile

Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 06:59:35AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:45:53 +0200
>> Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 06:27:41AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>>>> Andrew has a patch for this in his tree for a while... I was
>>>> assuming he'd do a patchdump to Linus late in -rc1 but it seems not
>>>> to have happened..
>>> The basic problem for the Alpha build errors are circular #include's 
>>> (that are anyway a pretty bad thing), and I'm currently attacking
>>> that problem (it seems to be surprisingly easy).
>>>
>>> That's IMHO better than the patch in -mm that uninlines 
>>> pci_ioremap_bar().
>> and in my opinion the uninline is nicer ;)
>> Because that means we can add more checks to it over time without
>> bloating the kernel.
> 
> My usage of the word "better" was wrong.
> 
> For fixing the compile error I do consider the patch I'm currently 
> testing as better, since this could otherwise beat us again in the 
> future.
> 
> But the patches are completely orthogonal, and there's no reason against 
> including both.
> 
> cu
> Adrian
> 

Any news? Something i could test?
rc5 still fails, just FYI :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ