linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] tracing/branch-tracer: Fix a trace recursion on branch tracer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 16 Nov 2008 07:22:13 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] tracing/branch-tracer: Fix a trace recursion on
	branch tracer


* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:

> Impact: Make the branch tracer use raw irq save/restore
> 
> When the branch tracer inserts an event through 
> probe_likely_condition(), it calls local_irq_save() and then results 
> in a trace recursion.
> 
> local_irq_save() -> trace_hardirqs_off() -> trace_hardirqs_off_caller()
> 	-> unlikely()
> 
> The trace_branch.c file is protected by DISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING but 
> that doesn't prevent from external call to functions that use 
> unlikely().
> 
> My box crashed each time I tried to set this tracer (sudden and hard 
> reboot).

So this patch fixes that problem, or are there other problems left?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/