[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081116073354.GF19646@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 08:33:54 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: walimis <walimisdev@...il.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ftrace: fix wrong pos computing when read buffer
has been fulfilled.
* walimis <walimisdev@...il.com> wrote:
> hi Steven,
>
> Could you help me to review this patch?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Impact: make output of available_filter_functions complete
>
> phenomenon:
>
> The first value of dyn_ftrace_total_info is not equal with
> `cat available_filter_functions | wc -l`, but they should be equal.
>
> root cause:
>
> When printing functions with seq_printf in t_show, if the read
> buffer is just overflowed by current function record, then this
> function won't be printed to user space through read buffer, it will
> just be dropped. So we can't see this function printing. So, every
> time the last function to fill the read buffer, if overflowed, will
> be dropped. This also applies to set_ftrace_filter if
> set_ftrace_filter has more bytes than read buffer.
>
> fix:
>
> Through checking return value of seq_printf, if less than 0, we know
> this function doesn't be printed. Then we decrease position to force
> this function to be printed next time, in next read buffer.
>
> another little fix is to show correct allocating pages count.
>
> Signed-off-by: walimis <walimisdev@...il.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
looks sane - applied to tip/tracing/urgent. Steve, any objections?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists