[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0811160410510.27319@p34.internal.lan>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 04:11:40 -0500 (EST)
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.27.6 question: ata_sff_hsm_move: ata15 (why always ata15)?
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
>> On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:22:58 -0600
>> Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> Justin Piszcz wrote:
>>>> I am trying to find out what the root cause of this error/problem is:
>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462425
>>> The problem is that people assume that timeouts with DRDY like that bug
>>> refers to must be the same problem when it is often not
>>
>> The first stopping point is to apply the DRQ drain patch I sent to the
>> list some time ago and is hopefully lined up for 2.6.29. After that point
>> you can begin to look at the remaining cases, until then its hardly worth
>> it.
>
> Is it really? For many SATA controllers, DRQ draining isn't really
> necessary. PATA might be a completely different story tho.
I have been running with the patch for almost 24 hours and running
extensive disk tests, so far nothing but sometimes it takes a few days
or more to repeat, I am continuing to test to see if the problem recurs..
Justin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists