lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081117144001.GA5379@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:40:01 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc:	Doug Chapman <doug.chapman@...com>,
	Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@...gle.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] thread_group_cputime: kill the bogus ->signal != NULL
	check

thread_group_cputime() is called by current when it must have the valid
->signal, or under ->siglock, or under tasklist_lock after the ->signal
check, or the caller is wait_task_zombie() which reaps the child. In any
case ->signal can't be NULL.

But the point of this patch is not optimization. If it is possible to call
thread_group_cputime() when ->signal == NULL we are doing something wrong,
and we should not mask the problem. thread_group_cputime() fills *times
and the caller will use it, if we silently use task_struct->*times* we
report the wrong values.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>

--- K-28/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c~TGTIME_KILL_CK_SIG	2008-11-16 22:09:38.000000000 +0100
+++ K-28/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c	2008-11-17 00:38:05.000000000 +0100
@@ -58,21 +58,21 @@ void thread_group_cputime(
 	struct task_struct *tsk,
 	struct task_cputime *times)
 {
-	struct signal_struct *sig;
+	struct task_cputime *totals, *tot;
 	int i;
-	struct task_cputime *tot;
 
-	sig = tsk->signal;
-	if (unlikely(!sig) || !sig->cputime.totals) {
+	totals = tsk->signal->cputime.totals;
+	if (!totals) {
 		times->utime = tsk->utime;
 		times->stime = tsk->stime;
 		times->sum_exec_runtime = tsk->se.sum_exec_runtime;
 		return;
 	}
+
 	times->stime = times->utime = cputime_zero;
 	times->sum_exec_runtime = 0;
 	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
-		tot = per_cpu_ptr(tsk->signal->cputime.totals, i);
+		tot = per_cpu_ptr(totals, i);
 		times->utime = cputime_add(times->utime, tot->utime);
 		times->stime = cputime_add(times->stime, tot->stime);
 		times->sum_exec_runtime += tot->sum_exec_runtime;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ