[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081117155425.GB12081@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:54:25 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Doug Chapman <doug.chapman@...com>,
Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] account_steal_time: kill the unneeded
account_group_system_time()
* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> I don't actually understand account_steal_time() and I failed to find the
> commit which added account_group_system_time(), but this looks bogus.
> In any case rq->idle must be single-threaded, so it can't have ->totals.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
>
> --- K-28/kernel/sched.c~ACCT_STEAL_KILL_GACCT 2008-11-10 13:05:09.000000000 +0100
> +++ K-28/kernel/sched.c 2008-11-16 23:40:05.000000000 +0100
> @@ -4198,7 +4198,6 @@ void account_steal_time(struct task_stru
>
> if (p == rq->idle) {
> p->stime = cputime_add(p->stime, steal);
> - account_group_system_time(p, steal);
> if (atomic_read(&rq->nr_iowait) > 0)
> cpustat->iowait = cputime64_add(cpustat->iowait, tmp);
could be a typo - is there no similar construct nearby?
Makes sense in any case, applied to tip/core/signal - thanks Oleg.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists