[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cfd18e0f0811170859w1d3f903ej1d5626f2d2bf4496@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:59:11 -0500
From: "Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com>
To: "Evgeniy Polyakov" <zbr@...emap.net>
Cc: "Robert Love" <rlove@...ve.org>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [take 3] Use pid in inotify events.
Hi Evgeniy,
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> This patch allows to send IO origin PID in inotify events (using cookie
> fields for all events except moving, where it is already used to track
> move from and move to parts) when its uid matches inotify owner uid or
> when inotify owner has admin (CAP_SYS_ADMIN) capabilities (Jeff
> Schroeder's idea).
>
> This is a resend of the previous patch, which was not commented by
> anyone. Does it mean no one objects? If so, please apply.
NAK. If we are going to do this -- and I leave the security
discussions to others more knowlegeable on that score than me -- then
the API design should be better than this. The current design is a
hack. Why exclude rename events? Why re-use the cookie field? The
only answers I can guess at are that the current patch is less work to
write. IMO, there are (much) better design possibilities, using
inotify1(), as I suggested earlier in this thread.
Thanks,
Michael
> Also removed John McCutchan's email, which bounces.
>
> Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
>
> diff --git a/fs/inotify.c b/fs/inotify.c
> index 690e725..835259d 100644
> --- a/fs/inotify.c
> +++ b/fs/inotify.c
> @@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ static atomic_t inotify_cookie;
> * inotify_add_watch() to the final put_inotify_watch().
> */
>
> +#define IH_FLAGS_ADMIN (0x00000001)
> +/* handler owner has admin capabilities */
> +
> /*
> * struct inotify_handle - represents an inotify instance
> *
> @@ -80,6 +83,8 @@ struct inotify_handle {
> struct list_head watches; /* list of watches */
> atomic_t count; /* reference count */
> u32 last_wd; /* the last wd allocated */
> + uid_t uid; /* owner's uid */
> + u32 flags; /* operation flags */
> const struct inotify_operations *in_ops; /* inotify caller operations */
> };
>
> @@ -292,6 +297,11 @@ void inotify_inode_queue_event(struct inode *inode, u32 mask, u32 cookie,
> mutex_lock(&ih->mutex);
> if (watch_mask & IN_ONESHOT)
> remove_watch_no_event(watch, ih);
> +
> + if (!cookie && ((ih->flags & IH_FLAGS_ADMIN) ||
> + (current->uid == ih->uid)))
> + cookie = task_tgid_vnr(current);
> +
> ih->in_ops->handle_event(watch, watch->wd, mask, cookie,
> name, n_inode);
> mutex_unlock(&ih->mutex);
> @@ -459,6 +469,10 @@ struct inotify_handle *inotify_init(const struct inotify_operations *ops)
> mutex_init(&ih->mutex);
> ih->last_wd = 0;
> ih->in_ops = ops;
> + ih->uid = current->user->uid;
> + ih->flags = 0;
> + if (capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> + ih->flags |= IH_FLAGS_ADMIN;
> atomic_set(&ih->count, 0);
> get_inotify_handle(ih);
>
> --
> Evgeniy Polyakov
>
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/docs/man-pages/man-pages.git
man-pages online: http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online_pages.html
Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists