[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081117192216.GA9944@localhost>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:22:16 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...i.uni-sb.de>,
Glauber Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86: save_args out of line
[Andi Kleen - Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 07:23:40PM +0100]
...
|
| Ok. Hopefully it's worth the effort. The branch misprediction bubble
| should not be too bad, perhaps it'll make up for the other cycles
| you're adding. But even if it doesn't decreasing cache line foot print is
| always a good thing.
...
May I turn in? :)
Original .macro interrupt func has
testl $3, CS(%rdi)
je 1f
SWAPGS
1: incl %gs:pda_irqcount
jne 2f
pop %rax
mov %gs:pda_irqstackptr,%rsp
push %rax
2: TRACE_IRQS_OFF
Wouldn't we help the branch predictor a bit by
testl $3, CS(%rdi)
je 1f
SWAPGS
jne 2f
1: pop %rax
mov %gs:pda_irqstackptr,%rsp
push %rax
2: incl %gs:pda_irqcount
TRACE_IRQS_OFF
I hope I didn't miss anything but maybe it's just a churning
or plain wrong. Don't shoot me :)
- Cyrill -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists