[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1226951006.21581.1285268501@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:43:26 +0100
From: "Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@...tmail.fm>
To: "Cyrill Gorcunov" <gorcunov@...il.com>,
"Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@...i.uni-sb.de>,
"Glauber Costa" <gcosta@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86: save_args out of line
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:22:16 +0300, "Cyrill Gorcunov"
<gorcunov@...il.com> said:
> [Andi Kleen - Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 07:23:40PM +0100]
> ...
> |
> | Ok. Hopefully it's worth the effort. The branch misprediction bubble
> | should not be too bad, perhaps it'll make up for the other cycles
> | you're adding. But even if it doesn't decreasing cache line foot print
> is
> | always a good thing.
> ...
>
> May I turn in? :)
Sure!
> Original .macro interrupt func has
>
> testl $3, CS(%rdi)
> je 1f
> SWAPGS
> 1: incl %gs:pda_irqcount
inc changes flags...
> jne 2f
> pop %rax
> mov %gs:pda_irqstackptr,%rsp
> push %rax
> 2: TRACE_IRQS_OFF
>
> Wouldn't we help the branch predictor a bit by
>
> testl $3, CS(%rdi)
> je 1f
> SWAPGS
> jne 2f
... so this is not the same.
> 1: pop %rax
> mov %gs:pda_irqstackptr,%rsp
> push %rax
> 2: incl %gs:pda_irqcount
> TRACE_IRQS_OFF
>
> I hope I didn't miss anything but maybe it's just a churning
> or plain wrong. Don't shoot me :)
I'm sure it helps the branch predictor, though ;).
Alexander
> - Cyrill -
--
Alexander van Heukelum
heukelum@...tmail.fm
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - A fast, anti-spam email service.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists