[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4921DC61.4000702@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:04:33 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, rjw@...k.pl,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, efault@....de, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: Re: skb_release_head_state(): Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression
on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28
Ingo Molnar a écrit :
> (gdb) list *0xffffffff8048942e
> 0xffffffff8048942e is in skb_release_head_state (include/linux/skbuff.h:1783).
> 1778 }
> 1779 #endif
> 1780 #ifdef CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER
> 1781 static inline void nf_bridge_put(struct nf_bridge_info *nf_bridge)
> 1782 {
> 1783 if (nf_bridge && atomic_dec_and_test(&nf_bridge->use))
> 1784 kfree(nf_bridge);
> 1785 }
> 1786 static inline void nf_bridge_get(struct nf_bridge_info *nf_bridge)
> 1787 {
>
> and ouch does that global dec on &nf_bridge->use hurt!
>
> i do have:
>
> CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER=y
>
> (this is a Fedora distro kernel derived .config)
Hum, you also should hit this cache line at atomic_inc() site then...
Strange, I never caught this one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists