lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:19:20 -0600
From:	"Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
To:	Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: busted CFS group load balancer?

Ken Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Chris Friesen wrote:
>>> It appears that the fair-group load balancer in 2.6.27 does not work
>>> properly.
>> There was an issue fixed post 2.6.27 where the load balancer didn't work
>> properly if there was one task per group per cpu.  You might try
>> backporting commit 38736f4 and see if that helps.
> 
> Tested git commit 38736f4, it doesn't fix the problem I'm seeing.
> 

I plugged in the same weights into my test app (groups 1 and 2 instead 
of ant/bee) and got the results below for a 10-sec run.  The "actual" 
numbers give the overall average and then the values for each hog 
separately.  In this case we see that both tasks in group 2 ended up 
sharing a cpu with one of the tasks from group 1.

   group      actual(%)      expected(%)  ctx switches   max_latency(ms)
       1  99.69(99.38/99.99)   99.81       160/262          4/0
       2   0.31( 0.31/0.31)     0.19       32/33         391/375

I've only got a 2-way system.  If the results really are that much worse 
on larger systems, then that's going to cause problems for us as well. 
I'll see if I can get some time on a bigger machine.

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ