[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081118132919.GB18198@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:29:19 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
David Safford <safford@...son.ibm.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serue@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] integrity: Linux Integrity Module(LIM)
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 02:09:40PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Ok. So, instead of integrity_nameidata_check(nd, flags), call it
> integrity_path_check(path, flags).
Yeah.
> Perhaps I'm looking at the wrong vfs tree, but I don't see the changes.
> Where is fsdevel?
linux-fsdevel@...r. But the patch actually went to lkml,
"[PATCH] pass a struct path * to may_open". Note that the plan is to
reduce availability of strut nameidata to a minimum outside of the core
path lookup functionality - so relying on it is not a good idea.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists