[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0811181031200.15003@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:31:51 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: walimis <walimisdev@...il.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ftrace: fix wrong pos computing when read buffer
has been fulfilled.
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, walimis wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 09:36:07AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >>
> >> fix:
> >>
> >> Through checking return value of seq_printf, if less than 0, we know
> >> this function doesn't be printed. Then we decrease position to force
> >> this function to be printed next time, in next read buffer.
> >
> >A lot of the code for seq files I cut and paste from other places that I
> >have written it. The seq files always confuse me, so I like to use stuff
> >that worked before. Some of the things that walimis fixed were not needed
> >for this file, and was overkill.
> It also confuse me a lot. I also checked all places using seq files in
> trace/ftrace code, to see whether there are similar problem.
> - trace.c: in s_start() it force pos to decrease one such as:
> l = *pos - 1;
> so it works well.
> - trace_stack.c: t_start, in almost all cases, can be only called
> once, so we don't see the error. But I wonder whether it still works
> well if output message exceeds the size of seq file buffer and call
> t_start twice. If needed, I can test it.
> - trace_branch.c : the same with above.
>
If you can find a bug, then by all means, fix it ;-)
Thanks,
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists