linux-kernel - Re: Can you add the staging tree to -next?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49230B3A.2000509@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date:	Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:36:42 +0100
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Can you add the staging tree to -next?

Greg KH wrote on November 14:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 08:42:48AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Apart from the patches you receive against -next, is there any other
>> advantage, giving staging is disabled?
> 
> That is a huge advantage, don't discount it.  My staging tree has over
> 150 patches in it right now, and is quite diverged from what is in
> Linus's tree.  I have been getting the same patches sent over and over
> to fix the same thing that is already resolved in my tree, as the
> developers are working against -next thinking that they were working
> with the latest development tree.

These people are missing that -next is not a development tree.
(Unless final integration tests count still as development.)
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- =-== =--=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/