linux-kernel - [Patch] MODULE_UNLOAD should depend on PROC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081118184052.GA24453@hack.voiplan.pt>
Date:	Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:40:52 +0000
From:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: [Patch] MODULE_UNLOAD should depend on PROC_FS


The feature controlled by MODULE_UNLOAD uses proc interface, so it
should depend on PROC_FS.

Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <wangcong@...ux.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>

---
diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
index 226da27..fade39e 100644
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -871,6 +871,7 @@ config MODULE_FORCE_LOAD
 
 config MODULE_UNLOAD
 	bool "Module unloading"
+	depends on PROC_FS
 	help
 	  Without this option you will not be able to unload any
 	  modules (note that some modules may not be unloadable


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/