linux-kernel - Re: Developing non-commercial drivers ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:25:33 -0500
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Fredrik Markström 
	<fredrik.markstrom@...lonenterprise.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Developing non-commercial drivers ?

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:16:44 +0100, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fredrik_Markstr=F6m?= said:
> I'm working for as a consultant for a large hardware company porting
> Linux to their new cpu-architecture and everything is pretty much
> up and running. Now they want us to develop a closed-source (to
> protect their IP) ethernet driver for their proprietary Ethernet MAC.

Am  I the only one that's boggled by the concept of a company that can develop
an entire CPU architecture and be OK on the GPL licensing of all the code
in arch/new-foo-cpu that exposes the IP of the cpu design, but they're worried
about the special sauce in a freakin' *ethernet controller*?

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped