linux-kernel - Re: [patch 2/8] x86 PAT: set VM_PFNMAP flag in vm_insert

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:37:35 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc:	"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/8] x86 PAT: set VM_PFNMAP flag in vm_insert_pfn


* Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 01:35:38PM -0800, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Nick Piggin [mailto:npiggin@...e.de]
> > >Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 6:06 PM
> > >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh
> > >Cc: Ingo Molnar; Thomas Gleixner; H Peter Anvin; Hugh Dickins;
> > >Roland Dreier; Jesse Barnes; Jeremy Fitzhardinge; Arjan van de
> > >Ven; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Siddha, Suresh B
> > >Subject: Re: [patch 2/8] x86 PAT: set VM_PFNMAP flag in vm_insert_pfn
> > >
> > >On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:47:23AM -0800, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Yes. It does. But, it calls a lower level insert_pfn()
> > >function. The lower
> > >> level insert_pfn() does not have any bug checks. But the higher level
> > >> vm_insert_pfn() checks for PFNMAP or MIXEDMAP.
> > >
> > >Yes, but is there anything extra you need to check for cache aliases in
> > >MIXEDMAP mappings?
> > >
> > 
> > Yes. We need additional things to track MIXEDMAP and we are looking at that.
> > But, that is slightly more trickier than the general PFNMAP case. And
> > only in-tree user of MIXEDMAP is xip and that too it only uses it for
> > regular WB mapping. So, we thought we should fix the more common case
> > first here.
> > 
> > With MIXEDMAP there is no way whether to distinguish whether insert_pfn
> > Or insert_page was used while looking at VMA. We can probably use PFNMAP
> > in addition to MIXEDMAP to indicate that, which will make things easier.
> 
> It's difficult because it can have either method for a single VMA, and
> a given address in the vma may even change over time (not with current
> code in kernel AFAIKS, but AXFS eventually might get to that point).
> 
> 
> > But, we are still looking at that and trying to understand the change
> > implication.
> 
> OK: now I understand correctly. Getting PFNMAP working is an important
> first step. I agree.

Venki, a patch logistics sidenote: the final mm/* bits of this 
patchset need acks from MM folks - Andrew, Nick or Hugh - we cannot 
just queue them up in the x86/pat tree without agreement from MM 
maintainers.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/