[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081118163620.de14c1ec.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:36:20 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Qinghuang Feng <qhfeng.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, qhfeng.kernel@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/binfmt_misc.c: let binfmt status be more readable
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:38:16 +0800
Qinghuang Feng <qhfeng.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> The following is what it looks like before patching.
> It is not much readable.
>
> user@...ntu:/proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc$ cat status
> enableduser@...ntu:/proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc$
>
> Signed-off-by: Qinghuang Feng <qhfeng.kernel@...il.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/fs/binfmt_misc.c b/fs/binfmt_misc.c
> index f2744ab..72e8b24 100644
> --- a/fs/binfmt_misc.c
> +++ b/fs/binfmt_misc.c
> @@ -652,7 +652,7 @@ static const struct file_operations bm_register_operations = {
> static ssize_t
> bm_status_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t nbytes, loff_t *ppos)
> {
> - char *s = enabled ? "enabled" : "disabled";
> + char *s = enabled ? "enabled\n" : "disabled\n";
>
> return simple_read_from_buffer(buf, nbytes, ppos, s, strlen(s));
> }
Well. That's a bugfix, really.
It fixes a bug which has been there for a very long time, in a way
which is non-backward-compatible.
Are there existing applications out there which will disastrously fail
if we add a newline to the /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc/status contents? I
somehow doubt it. But we shall find out :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists