[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081119093611.GF22309@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:36:11 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
joerg.roedel@....com, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] AMD IOMMU updates for 2.6.28-rc5
* Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org> wrote:
> We can't test all drivers for those bugs until 2.6.28 will be
> released. And these bugs can corrupt data, for example when a driver
> frees dma addresses allocated by another driver and these addresses
> are then reallocated.
>
> The only way to protect the drivers from each other is to isolate
> them in different protection domains. The AMD IOMMU driver prints a
> WARN_ON() if a driver frees dma addresses not yet mapped. This
> triggered with the bnx2 and the ixgbe driver.
>
> And the data corruption is real, it eat the root-fs of my testbox
> one time.
a WARN_ON() can be acted upon much easier than silent/spurious data
corruption. So printing a WARN_ON() will result in drivers being fixed
a lot faster (and with a lot less debugging needed) than if we were
intentionally letting DMA corruption happen. The WARN_ON() will be
routed to kerneloops.org on the major distros, etc. etc.
> I agree that we need to fix the drivers. I plan to implement some
> debug code which allows driver developers to detect those bugs even
> if they have no IOMMU in the system.
That would be _really_ nice to have.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists