linux-kernel - Re: [Patch] MODULE_UNLOAD should depend on PROC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:48:44 +0000
From:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] MODULE_UNLOAD should depend on PROC_FS

On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:41:53AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>On Wednesday 19 November 2008 05:10:52 Américo Wang wrote:
>> The feature controlled by MODULE_UNLOAD uses proc interface, so it
>> should depend on PROC_FS.
>
>Hi Wang,
>
>   This patch looks wrong to me; you can remove modules without /proc.  Does 
>it not compile with CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD=y and CONFIG_PROC_FS=n?
>

Thank you, Rusty and Alan!

I think I was wrong. It is compiled fine with the above config, just tested.


-- 
"Sometimes the only way to stay sane is to go a little crazy."

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/