lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:51:48 -0800 (PST)
From:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] protect /sbin/init from unwanted signals more

The effect is fine, but that seems like a kludgey way to do it.
I really don't think the sigaction case matters--certainly it will never
come up with SIGKILL.  What about just this instead?

--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -66,6 +66,15 @@ static int sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig)
 		return 0;
 
 	handler = sig_handler(t, sig);
+
+	/*
+	 * For init, short-circuit any signal without a handler.
+	 * We won't allow them to be delivered, so don't even queue them.
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(signal->flags & SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE) &&
+	    (handler == SIG_IGN || handler == SIG_DFL))
+		return 1;
+
 	if (!sig_handler_ignored(handler, sig))
 		return 0;
 
With that, I wonder if the SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE checks in get_signal_to_deliver
and complete_signal are needed at all.  Hmm, I guess we do because this
doesn't affect blocked signals, so they might be unblocked and delivered.
(Note that since it doesn't affect blocked signals, this doesn't break init
using sigwait if it wanted to.)


Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ