linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for November 19 (mtd build error)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:45:52 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
CC:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for November 19 (mtd build error)

Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 19:24 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 19:18 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> So does the dependency need to be something like
>>> "depends on SFC && MTD && !(SFC=y && MTD=m)"?
>> If it's a separate driver, perhaps it's sufficient just to make it a
>> tristate and make it depend on SFC && MTD?
> 
> It's not a separate driver.

and it already depends on SFC && MTD.  Weird that it fails like this.

-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/