[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081119201444.GB4765@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:14:44 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from
2.6.22 -> 2.6.28
* Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > Christoph, as per the recent analysis of Mike:
> >
> > http://fixunix.com/kernel/556867-regression-benchmark-throughput-loss-a622cf6-f7160c7-pull.html
> >
> > all scheduler components of this regression have been eliminated.
> >
> > In fact his numbers show that scheduler speedups since 2.6.22 have
> > offset and hidden most other sources of tbench regression. (i.e. the
> > scheduler portion got 5% faster, hence it was able to offset a
> > slowdown of 5% in other areas of the kernel that tbench triggers)
>
> Ok will rerun the tests tomorrow. Just got back from SC08 need some
> time to catch up.
>
> Looks like a lot of work was done on this issue. Thanks!
You might also want to try net-next:
[remote "net-next"]
url = git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next-2.6.git
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/net-next/*
Some good stuff is in there too, impacting this workload.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists